Selection from the list of topics

back

growing stock (stemwood) #21
Stemwood volume of living trees and shrubs (standing and lying) with a diameter at breast height (dbh) ≥12 cm with bark.

main tree species #90
Type of trees and shrubs ≥12 cm in diameter at breast height (dbh) with the ten most common species or species groups in Switzerland ('main tree species') categorised, and the classes 'other conifers' and 'other broadleaves' for the remaining species. The main tree species are: spruce (Picea spp.), fir (Abies spp.), pine (Pinus sylvestris, P. nigra, P. strobus, P. mugo subsp. uncinata), larch (Larix spp.), Arolla pine (Pinus cembra), beech (Fagus sylvatica), maple (Acer spp.), ash (Fraxinus spp.), oak (Quercus spp.) and chestnut (Castanea sativa). Reference: Field Survey (MID 50: Baumart)

altitudinal vegetation belts (NaiS; 6 classes) #2633
Altitudinal vegetation belts in the system used in the guidelines for monitoring the sustainability and performance of protection forests (NaiS; Frehner et al. 2005), reduced to six classes. The variable represents a simplification of the NaiS altitudinal vegetation belts with ten classes (NAISHSTKOMB) in which the classes «hyperinsubric» and «colline» are merged with «colline with beech» to form the class «hyperinsubric and colline» and the class «lower montane» with «upper montane» and «lower/upper montane» to form the class «lower and upper montane». The information is based on the altitudinal vegetation belts determined by experts (accessible forest sample plots of NFI4 on the 1.4-km network; Arge Frehner et al. 2020), as well as on the altitudinal vegetation belts modelled for the period 1981-2010 (other sample plots; Zischg et al. 2021).

canton #827
Regional demarcation with the cantons as a unit, with the two half-cantons, Basel-Land and Basel-Stadt, combined into one canton for statistical reasons.

accessible forest without shrub forest #434
Forest of which less than two-thirds is covered with shrubs that can be accessed on foot.

1.4-km grid #410
NFI's sampling grid with a mesh size of 1.4 km. The 1.4-km grid is the grid size covering all the previous terrestrial Inventories, which is why it is also called the base grid.

What do the numbers stand for?
What is the purpose of the standard error?
When are two results statistically different?
When is it not sufficient to consider only the standard error?
Two types of changes?
Change analyses: When are the results (not) additive?
Why is a dot (“.”) sometimes given in the cells for standard error or estimated value?
Why are no standard error values shown in some tables?
Negative values for growing stock, increment or fellings?

1. What do the numbers stand for?

The tables mainly show results that were calculated using statistical methods from the data of the sample inventory of the National Forest Inventory (NFI). Such results always consist of two figures: (1) the estimated value and (2) the sampling error, the so-called standard error.

Example 1: Estimated value and standard error

NFI5

volume of deadwood (stemwood)
ownership (2 categories)

regional demarcation: production region

unit: m³/ha

evaluation area: accessible forest without shrub forest

grid: 1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5

state 2018/26
	production region
	Jura		Plateau		Pre-Alps		Alps		Southern Alps		Switzerland
ownership (2 categories)	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%
public	30	10	17	13	37	9	36	6	26	10	30	4
private	27	17	20	12	50	10	32	8	39	13	34	5
total	29estimated value	9standard error	19	9	44	7	35	5	29	8	32	3

The tables usually show the relative (percentage) standard error (“±%”), but occasionally – in the case of estimated percentages – the absolute standard error (“±”).

top

2. What is the purpose of the standard error?

The standard error can be used to define confidence intervals around the estimated value, which contain the true value of the population with a certain statistical certainty.

The statistical certainty is:

68% if the confidence interval is calculated using the standard error
(68% confidence interval = estimated value ± standard error), and
95% if the confidence interval is calculated using twice the standard error
(95% confidence interval = estimated value ± 2 × standard error*)

Example 2: Calculating confidence intervals

LFI5
volume of deadwood (stemwood)
ownership (2 categories)
regional demarcation: production region
unit: m³/ha
evaluation area: accessible forest without shrub forest
grid: 1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
state 2018/26
	production region
	Jura
ownership (2 classes)	m³/ha	±%
public	30	10
private	27	17
total	29	9

Question
What are the 68% and 95% confidence intervals of the above estimates?

Procedure

Calculate the absolute standard error (= relative standard error × estimated value / 100)
Calculate the confidence intervals
- 68% confidence interval = estimated value ± absolute standard error
- 95% confidence interval = estimated value ± 2 × absolute standard error

Answer

			Step 1	Step 2

ownership (2 categories)	volume of deadwood Jura NFI5
	estimated value	standard error		confidence interval
		relative	absolute	68%	95%
	m³/ha	±%	±m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha
public	30	10	3	27-33	24-36
private	27	17	5	22-32	17-37
total	29	9	3	26-32calculated with the standard error, i.e. 29 ± 3	23-25calculated with twice the standard error, i.e. 29 ± 2 × 3

The volume of deadwood in the Jura is between 26 and 32 m³/ha with a statistical certainty of 68% and between 23 and 35 m³/ha with a statistical certainty of 95%.

The 95% confidence interval is larger than the 68% confidence interval. This results in higher statistical certainty with the 95% confidence interval.

Example 3: Visualisation of the 68% and 95% confidence intervals

Data: see example 2

When interpreting the results, one must define the level of statistical certainty that one would like to apply to the statement.

The 68% confidence interval is generally used in the National Forest Inventory (NFI).

top

3. When are two results statistically different?*

This can be checked by comparing the confidence intervals of two estimated values:

If the 68% confidence intervals of two estimates do not overlap, it can be assumed with some certainty that the two populations differ.
If the 95% confidence intervals of two estimates do not overlap, it can be assumed with high certainty that the two populations differ.

Example 4: Interpretation of two results from the same inventory

NFI5
growing stock (stemwood)
ownership (2 categories)
regional demarcation: production region
unit: m³/ha
evaluation area: accessible forest without shrub forest
grid: 1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
state 2018/26
	production region
	Jura		Plateau		Pre-Alps		Alps		Southern Alps		Switzerland
ownership (2 categories)	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%
public	331	3	311	3	405	4	300	3	256	5	314	2
private	387	5	432	4	454	4	348	4	285	6	398	2
total	345	2	363	2	431	2	314	2	262	4	343	1

	case 2						case 1

case 1

Question
Is the growing stock per hectare greater in the Alps than in the Southern Alps?

Procedure

Calculate the absolute standard errors
Calculate the confidence intervals depending on the desired level of statistical certainty:
- 68% confidence intervals (some certainty; absolute standard error)
- 95% confidence intervals (high certainty; twice the absolute standard error)
Assess whether the confidence intervals corresponding to the desired level of statistical certainty do not overlap

Answer

ownership (2 categories)	growing stock NFI5
	Alps					Southern Alps
	estimated value	standard error		confidence interval		estimated value	standard error		confidence interval
		relative	absolute	68%	95%		relative	absolute	68%	95%
	m³/ha	±%	±m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha	±%	±m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha
total	314	2	6	308-320	302-326	262	4	10	252-272	242-282

Neither the 68%-confidence intervals nor the 95%-confidence intervals overlap (pairs of values in ).

In this case, the level of statistical certainty selected has no influence on the result.

Overall, this means that there is high statistical certainty that the growing stock per hectare is greater in the Alps than in the Southern Alps.

Case 2

Question
Is the growing stock per hectare greater in the Plateau than in the Jura?

Procedure

See case 1.

Answer

ownership (2 categories)	growing stock NFI5
	Jura					Plateau
	estimated value	standard error		confidence interval		estimated value	standard error		confidence interval
		relative	absolute	68%	95%		relative	absolute	68%	95%
	m³/ha	±%	±m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha	±%	±m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha
total	345	2	7	338-352	331-359	363	2	7	356-370	349-377

The 68%-confidence intervals do not overlap (pairs of values in ).
In contrast, the 95%-confidence intervals overlap (pairs of values in ).

In this case, the level of statistical certainty selected has an influence on the interpretation of the results. At the 68% confidence interval level, the conclusion is that the growing stock per hectare is higher in the Plateau than in the Jura. At the 95% confidence interval level, however, this conclusion cannot be drawn.

Considering both confidence interval levels, it can be said that there is some, but not high, statistical certainty that the growing stock per hectare is greater in the Plateau than in the Jura.

The confidence intervals can also be used to determine whether a value estimated with a sample from the National Forest Inventory (NFI) deviates from a target value (e.g. from Swiss forest policy) or whether a change between two inventories is statistically certain.

Example 5: Interpretation of two results from different inventories

ownership (2 categories)	growing stock Plateau*
	NFI4		NFI5
	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%
public	340	3	309	3
private	447	4	432	4
total	386	2	363	2
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

Question
Has the growing stock per hectare in the Plateau decreased from NFI4 to NFI5?

Procedure

Calculate the absolute standard errors
Calculate the confidence intervals depending on the desired level of statistical certainty:
- 68% confidence intervals (some certainty; absolute standard error)
- 95% confidence intervals (high certainty; twice the absolute standard error)
Assess whether the confidence intervals corresponding to the desired level of statistical certainty do not overlap.

Answer

ownership (2 categories)	growing stock Plateau*
	NFI4					NFI5
	estimated value	standard error		confidence interval		estimated value	standard error		confidence interval
		relative	absolute	68%	95%		relative	absolute	68%	95%
	m³/ha	±%	±	m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha	±%	±	m³/ha	m³/ha
public	340	3	11	329-351	318-362	309	3	11	298-320	287-331
private	447	4	16	431-463	415-479	432	4	17	415-449	398-466
total	386	2	8	378-394	370-402	363	2	9	354-372	345-381
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

The 68%-confidence intervals do not overlap in the public forest (pairs of values in ), but they do in the private forest and the total forest (pairs of values in ). At the certainty level of the 68% confidence intervals, it can be concluded that the growing stock per hectare in the public forest of the Plateau has decreased. For the private forest, as well as for the total forest, the decrease is not statistically certain at this level.

The 95%-confidence intervals overlap in all three categories. At the certainty level of the 95% confidence intervals, it is therefore not certain that the growing stock has decreased, even for the public forest.

See also examples 6 and 7, in which changes between two inventories are interpreted using the more sensitive metric of net change.

For many target variables in the NFI, it is possible to determine whether a change between two inventories is statistically certain, not only by comparing the states in the two inventories (see example 5), but also by analysing the net change** between the two inventories.

To do this, one must first define the level of statistical certainty that one would like to apply to the statement (as done above):

A net change has occurred with some certainty if the relative standard error is less than 100% or if the confidence interval calculated with the absolute standard error (68% confidence interval) does not include the value 0.
A net change has occurred with high certainty if twice the relative standard error is less than 100% or if the confidence interval calculated with twice the absolute standard error (95% confidence interval) does not include the value 0.

Example 6: Interpretation of net changes with the relative standard error

ownership (2 categories)	change in growing stock from NFI4 to NFI5, Plateau*
	estimated value	standard error
	m³/ha	±%
public	-34	30
private	-9	147
total	-23	34
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

Question
Has the growing stock per hectare in the Plateau decreased from NFI4 to NFI5?

Procedure

Define the level of statistical certainty (68% or 95% confidence interval)
Determine whether:
- the relative standard error is less than 100% (certainty level of the 68% confidence interval)
- twice the relative standard error is less than 100% (certainty level of the 95% confidence interval)

Answer

ownership (2 categories)	change in growing stock from NFI4 to NFI5, Plateau*
	estimated value	standard error
		single	double
	m³/ha	±%	±%
public	-34	30	60
private	-9	147	294
total	-23	34	68
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

The single relative standard error is less than 100% for both the public forest and the total forest (highlighted values). For the private forest, however, it is greater than 100% (highlighted values). At the certainty level of the 68% confidence interval, it can be concluded that the growing stock in the Plateau has decreased in the public forest and in total. For the private forest, on the other hand, the decrease in stock is not statistically certain at this level.

The same conclusion is reached in this example with the certainty level of the 95% confidence interval, as twice the relative standard error is again less than 100% for both the public forest and the total forest.

Overall, this means that there is high statistical certainty that the growing stock per hectare has decreased in the public forest in the Plateau, as well as overall. For private forests, on the other hand, the decrease in stock is not statistically certain (as twice the relative standard error and the relative standard error are both less than 100%).

Example 7: Interpretation of net changes with the absolute standard error

ownership (2 categories)	change in growing stock from NFI4 to NFI5, Plateau*
	estimated value	standard error
	%	±
public	-10	3
private	-2	3
total	-6	2
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

Question
Has the growing stock per hectare in the Plateau decreased from NFI4 to NFI5?

Procedure

Define the level of statistical certainty (68% or 95% confidence interval)
Calculate the confidence interval based on the defined certainty level
- 68% confidence interval with the absolute standard error
- 95% confidence interval with twice the absolute standard error
Determine whether the corresponding confidence interval does not include the value 0

Answer

ownership (2 categories)	change in growing stock from NFI4 to NFI5, Plateau*
	estimated value	standard error		confidence interval
		single	double	68%	95%
	%	±	±	%	%
public	-10	3	6	-13 to -7	-16 to -4
private	-2	3	6	-5 to +1	-8 to +4
total	-6	2	4	-8 to -4	-10 to -2
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

Neither the 68% nor the 95% confidence interval includes the value 0 for the public forest or for the total forest. At both certainty levels, this leads to the conclusion that the growing stock in the Plateau has decreased in the public forest and in total. For the private forest, on the other hand, the decrease in stock is not statistically certain (as the confidence intervals include the value 0).

Net changes can be interpreted using the absolute or relative standard error (see examples 6 and 7). It is advisable to use the absolute standard error if the estimated value in the table is shown as a percentage (%; as in example 7), and the relative standard error if the estimated value in the table is shown in absolute terms (m³, m³/ha, pc, m²; as in example 6). This means that the standard error can be taken directly from the table and does not need to be converted.

To assess whether a change is statistically certain, it is advisable to analyse the net change between the two inventories wherever possible. Net changes are more sensitive than status comparisons, which makes it easier to detect differences statistically. See examples 6 and 7 (net change) and 7 (comparison of two results from different inventories).

top

4. When is it not sufficient to consider only the standard error?

The National Forest Inventory (NFI) is a sample-based large-scale inventory whose sample areas are arranged on a grid with a mesh size of 1.4 km × 1.4 km. The NFI was designed in such a way that the growing stock for Switzerland as a whole can be predicted with a maximum standard error of 1%.

If results are requested for individual regions or for individual classes, the standard error quickly becomes much larger. This is because the number of sample areas and subjects (e.g. sample trees, young forest plants, pieces of deadwood) analysed for the queried combination of variable expressions* is considerably lower than for the total.

Example 8: Standard error and combination of variable expressions

region	growing stock
	total		maple		sycamore		Norway maple
	estimated value	standard error	estimated value	standard error	estimated value	standard error	estimated value	standard error
	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%
Switzerland	343	1	12	5	11	5	1	20
production region "Plateau"	363	2	15	10	14	11	0	50
Canton of Aargau	289	7	15	20	13	20	1	63

The standard error increases as the level of detail increases.

Large standard errors are to be expected if:

forest districts are selected as the regional demarcation or results for small cantons (e.g. Appenzell Innerrhoden, Nidwalden) are queried,
a classification variable with many classes is selected (e.g. tree species in 56 classes),
several classification variables are combined with each other (e.g. main tree species and development stage).

Large standard errors are an indication that the estimate may have been based on too small a number of sample areas or subjects and that the result of the estimate therefore may not be reliable.

For the target variable “number of stems of young forest plants with browsing damage” (browsing intensity), an uncertain estimate is not necessarily recognisable by a large standard error. This is because this target variable is a quotient estimator**, which is – due to the survey method – only based on a small number of assessed young forest plants for rarer tree species (e.g. pine, larch, Arolla pine, oak, chestnut). Accordingly, for this target variable one should always check how many young forest plants were assessed for the individual estimates. As a rule of thumb, at least 30 young forest plants per estimate should have been assessed for browsing in order to obtain a reliable estimate.

top

5. Two types of changes?

There are two types of changes in the National Forest Inventory (NFI):

The first type of change involves specific target variables for change components such as increment, fellings or mortality. These target variables are only available for two consecutive measurement cycles, e.g. NFI4 to NFI5. When change components are analysed, the classification variable expression of the second measurement cycle is generally assigned to the first measurement cycle. These analyses therefore do not take into account any change in the expression (e.g. from private to public ownership) from the earlier to the later measurement cycle.
In the second type of change, the difference in target variables, such as stem number, growing stock or forest area, is used to calculate the net change between two measurement cycles. These target variables are usually used to represent states, e.g. that in NFI5, but can also show the net change between any two measurement cycles, e.g. between NFI1 and NFI5. In these net change analyses, the change in expression is taken into account for some of the classification variables, including “tree condition” and “forest, non-forest”. In this way, it can be seen, for example, that the forest area has increased. For the remaining classification variables, the expressions are regarded as static. This means that the most recent state – whether it was assessed in a measurement cycle (e.g. “primary forest function NFI5”) or taken from an external data source (e.g. “protection forest [2022]”) – is assigned to all measurement cycles.

top

6. Change analyses: When are the results (not) additive?

The results are:

additive if they are reported as the total change between two measurement dates. For example, the fellings for the various production regions reported in cubic metres (m³) can be added together to obtain the total fellings for Switzerland.
not additive if they are reported as a change per year (e.g. m³/year). For example, the fellings for the various production regions reported in cubic metres per year (m³/year) cannot be added together to obtain the total fellings for Switzerland.

Example 9: : Additivity/non-additivity of changes

	growing stock: total change between NFI4 and NFI5 (in 1000 m³)*
	Jura		Plateau		Pre-Alps		Alps		Southern Alps		Switzerland
higher/lower altitude zone	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%
lower altitude zone	-3759.0	28	-4909.1	36	-1025.2	133	-317.1	195	3464.1	31	-6546.3	42
higher altitude zone	574.3	117	-328.0	62	1093.0	123	7128.4	21	666.7	93	9134.3	24
total	-3184.7	40	-5237.1	34	67.9	2805	6811.3	23	4130.8	30	2588.1	136
	* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5
	additive

	growing stock: annual change between NFI4 and NFI5 (in 1000 m³/year)*
	Jura		Plateau		Pre-Alps		Alps		Southern Alps		Switzerland
higher/lower altitude zone	1000 m³/year	±%	1000 m³/year	±%	1000 m³/year	±%	1000 m³/year	±%	1000 m³/year	±%	1000 m³/year	±%
lower altitude zone	-421.1	28	-560.6	36	-115.7	133	-35.9	195	389.5	31	-740.7	42
higher altitude zone	64.7	117	-38.3	62	122.4	123	810.4	21	74.9	93	1032.7	24
total	-357.3	40	-598.4	34	7.6	2805	773.8	23	464.4	30	292.7	136
	* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5
	not additive

The non-additivity of changes expressed per year arises because the total change is divided by the average number of years between the two measurement dates in the domain* under consideration, and this average number of years varies slightly depending on the domain.

Example 10: Average number of years per domain

domain		mean number of years*
production region	higher/lower altitude zone
Mittelland	-	8.75
Plateau	higher altitude zone	8.56
Plateau	lower altitude zone	8.76
Southern Alps	-	8.90
Southern Alps	higher altitude zone	8.90
Southern Alps	lower altitude zone	8.89
* between the NFI4 and NFI5 measurements in the accessible forest without shrub forest

top

7. Why is a dot (“.”) sometimes given in the cells for standard error or estimated value?

In the calculation of a results table, data is not always available for all combinations of variable expressions*. In most cases, this indicates that the variable estimated with the relevant target variable does not occur or only occurs very rarely. The value 0 is then usually used. However, as this value is not based on any direct measurements, a dot (“.”) is given for the associated standard error. If reference is made to the assumed value of 0 in the calculation, e.g. in the case of percentages or certain change estimates, no value can be used. In this case, a dot (“.”) is given for the estimated value and the standard error.

For example, no Arolla pines have yet been found and measured in the Plateau in the National Forest Inventory (NFI) (growing stock of Arolla pine by production region). It can therefore be assumed that the values are missing because the Arolla pine actually does not occur in the Plateau, and therefore the growing stock in that region must be 0.

top

8. Why are no standard error values shown in some tables?

The data in these tables originates from a complete survey and not from a sample inventory. Accordingly, it is not necessary to specify a standard error because there is no uncertainty due to sampling.

The forest road network survey that the National Forest Inventory (NFI) periodically carries out with the local forestry services is an example of such a complete survey.

top

9. Negative values for growing stock, increment or fellings?

A negative value is possible if the result could only be calculated on the basis of a few trees. The estimate is therefore not reliable. This is also reflected in the standard error, which is usually extremely large for negative stock, increment or felling values.

Negative values can occur because, when the stemwood volume of the tally trees is determined, the volume estimated solely on the basis of the diameter at breast height (DBH) (tariff volume) is adjusted using the volume of the tally trees estimated on the basis of DBH, diameter at 7 m height and tree height. This procedure enables an unbiased and more accurate calculation of the stemwood volume. However, it can lead to negative values for all target variables that are based on the stemwood volume of the tally trees (e.g. growing stock, increment, fellings) if the number of tally trees in the selected combination of variable expressions* is small.

top

NFI2
growing stock (stemwood)
main tree species · altitudinal vegetation belts (NaiS; 6 classes)
regional demarcation: canton
unit: 1000 m³
evaluation area: accessible forest without shrub forest
grid: 1.4-km grid
state 1993/95
		canton
		AG		AI		AR		BE		BL/BS		FR		GE		GL		GR		JU		LU		NE		NW		OW		SG		SH		SO		SZ		TG		TI		UR		VD		VS		ZG		ZH		Switzerland
main tree species	altitudinal vegetation belts (NaiS; 6 classes)	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%
n/a	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	lower and upper montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	submontane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
spruce	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	13	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	13	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	162	35	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	14	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	48	64	5	.	0	.	100	34	0	.	0	.	327	23
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	3331	17	0	.	3	.	0	.	502	48	10422	8	0	.	40	94	0	.	162	58	479	34	492	37	0	.	0	.	182	62	0	.	1210	21	268	51	725	36	4764	13	0	.	0	.	22579	6
	high-montane	0	.	5	.	0	.	6942	14	0	.	1798	24	0	.	535	48	18064	7	0	.	892	30	0	.	209	51	1663	23	1016	29	0	.	0	.	1162	25	0	.	2653	16	2073	23	2268	19	6518	10	74	.	0	.	45873	4
	lower and upper montane	346	35	1434	26	2755	19	19840	7	416	45	6405	13	0	.	2092	25	2055	18	2666	17	7117	13	4420	12	624	35	2197	23	8768	12	416	38	971	22	4881	15	734	30	615	34	795	33	9727	9	797	26	1162	31	2569	17	83802	3
	submontane	4907	14	0	.	0	.	7402	11	545	40	2230	21	0	.	0	.	99	57	905	27	1777	21	272	44	21	100	131	63	1379	26	1033	27	2042	23	62	76	3211	18	0	.	136	52	2476	20	118	64	100	70	5292	13	34138	5
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	14	88	0	.	154	83	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	10	.	102	58	0	.	0	.	141	49	0	.	86	76	507	34
	total	5253	14	1439	26	2755	19	37514	5	961	30	10437	10	14	88	3129	20	30970	5	3571	14	9825	10	4691	12	1017	26	4483	15	11654	10	1449	22	3013	17	6288	12	3955	16	4627	11	3277	17	15196	7	12438	7	1337	28	7947	10	187239	2
fir	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	16	117	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	12	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	2	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	27	64	0	.	0	.	40	63	0	.	0	.	97	39
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	566	29	0	.	98	65	0	.	0	.	856	24	0	.	1	100	0	.	6	272	121	41	8	100	0	.	0	.	7	70	0	.	276	45	105	51	366	45	682	29	0	.	0	.	3093	13
	lower and upper montane	539	40	429	31	1109	26	12620	8	320	42	2260	18	0	.	499	37	632	28	2656	16	3605	14	3248	14	279	44	517	36	3691	14	48	69	1000	20	1587	18	460	43	739	29	341	41	4540	11	321	34	302	34	1550	20	43292	4
	submontane	1548	21	0	.	0	.	3540	15	198	37	79	61	0	.	0	.	30	76	620	35	1527	23	268	39	1	100	33	100	95	50	51	92	706	28	11	100	506	37	0	.	103	72	644	27	1	100	43	70	998	24	11001	8
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1	.	12	100	0	.	0	.	0	100	0	.	0	.	14	89
	total	2087	19	429	31	1109	26	16742	7	518	29	2437	17	0	.	499	37	1530	18	3276	15	5134	12	3516	13	288	43	671	29	3794	14	99	58	1706	16	1605	18	967	28	1054	23	549	30	5549	10	1044	22	346	31	2548	15	57496	3
pine	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	282	32	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	45	75	12	.	0	.	21	75	0	.	0	.	361	27
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	90	45	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	310	22	0	.	-1	100	0	.	0	.	72	89	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	73	56	0	.	0	.	544	20
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	28	62	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1541	18	0	.	50	66	0	.	0	.	28	100	1	100	0	.	0	.	19	100	0	.	174	59	85	72	0	.	1383	20	0	.	0	.	3310	12
	lower and upper montane	107	47	21	100	8	100	698	26	26	72	29	71	0	.	0	.	425	34	339	40	0	.	64	59	0	.	3	100	278	37	92	51	330	29	102	61	83	45	0	.	18	85	43	81	214	45	0	.	315	30	3195	11
	submontane	719	23	0	.	0	.	426	42	577	29	444	41	0	.	0	.	262	49	252	39	102	57	56	74	0	.	0	.	65	78	211	39	205	33	53	100	403	28	0	.	85	59	251	44	26	74	0	.	1082	20	5218	9
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	66	72	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	15	.	111	75	0	.	0	.	387	26	0	.	57	100	635	24
	total	826	21	21	100	8	100	1243	21	603	28	473	39	66	72	0	.	2820	13	592	28	151	44	121	47	0	.	103	68	344	33	303	31	535	22	174	48	500	24	330	41	201	41	294	39	2103	15	0	.	1454	17	13264	6
larch	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	6	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	6	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1720	16	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	161	42	0	.	0	.	1092	19	0	.	0	.	2973	12
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	20	105	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	2507	12	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	10	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	812	19	11	100	35	82	3041	14	0	.	0	.	6436	8
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	9	71	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1845	15	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	14	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1019	22	0	.	30	59	3207	13	0	.	0	.	6124	9
	lower and upper montane	91	94	6	100	65	100	165	42	17	71	0	.	0	.	25	100	271	34	0	.	111	95	22	100	0	.	13	100	333	41	10	100	0	.	27	100	16	100	756	26	0	.	138	49	319	53	34	100	75	54	2492	15
	submontane	298	30	0	.	0	.	217	41	0	.	207	54	0	.	0	.	127	78	25	71	12	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	56	64	77	64	32	65	24	100	31	81	0	.	0	.	142	61	0	.	0	.	258	43	1505	17
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	36	43	0	.	0	.	121	58	0	.	0	.	156	46
	total	390	32	6	100	65	100	409	28	17	71	207	54	0	.	25	100	6476	8	25	71	123	86	22	100	0	.	13	100	414	34	87	58	32	65	51	71	46	63	2784	12	11	100	345	33	7779	8	34	100	333	35	19692	5
Arolla pine	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1155	17	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1	100	9	.	0	.	613	19	0	.	0	.	1777	13
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	3	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	224	39	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	33	100	16	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	199	39	0	.	0	.	474	26
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	4	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	12	71	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	16	58
	lower and upper montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	submontane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	0	.	0	.	0	.	7	71	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1390	15	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	33	100	16	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1	100	9	100	0	.	812	17	0	.	0	.	2267	11
other conifers	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	23	55	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	2	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	26	51
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	21	61	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	10	94	0	.	0	.	31	51
	high-montane	0	.	2	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	4	58	0	.	1	71	0	.	0	.	8	41
	lower and upper montane	5	89	0	.	2	100	148	49	0	.	0	100	0	.	1	100	0	.	1	100	80	95	3	100	6	100	1	100	105	91	0	.	15	51	1	100	3	100	0	.	1	100	136	62	0	.	0	.	31	43	539	31
	submontane	78	47	0	.	0	.	111	52	63	82	48	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	35	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	-11	109	29	81	0	.	0	.	5	73	0	.	0	.	30	70	0	.	0	.	32	65	422	26
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	7	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	7	100
	total	83	45	2	100	2	100	259	36	63	82	49	99	0	.	1	100	45	40	1	100	116	73	3	100	6	100	1	100	95	102	29	81	15	51	1	100	8	59	7	100	7	48	166	53	12	85	0	.	64	39	1033	19
beech	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	6	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	6	100
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	32	48	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	4	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	73	53	0	.	0	.	0	100	0	.	0	.	109	39
	lower and upper montane	979	26	202	38	815	29	8249	9	1485	23	1925	18	0	.	904	25	1048	22	3148	13	1639	19	1413	17	489	31	989	33	3602	14	385	34	2892	14	1518	21	266	41	3498	13	260	43	3856	11	427	27	304	38	1769	18	42064	3
	submontane	4752	11	0	.	0	.	4682	12	2177	19	1698	22	0	.	30	.	126	48	946	27	1218	25	166	47	54	82	242	61	1161	28	1149	18	2427	17	166	55	1185	18	0	.	84	53	2503	16	72	68	21	97	2804	14	27662	4
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	31	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	5	.	427	26	0	.	0	.	12	100	0	.	11	100	486	24
	total	5731	10	202	38	815	29	12931	7	3662	14	3623	14	0	.	934	24	1236	19	4094	12	2857	15	1578	16	543	29	1231	29	4767	12	1534	16	5319	10	1683	19	1456	16	4004	11	344	35	6359	9	511	24	326	36	4585	11	70327	2
maple	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	2	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	5	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	15	68	0	.	0	.	0	.	22	53
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	176	42	0	.	3	100	0	.	0	.	86	39	0	.	0	.	0	.	14	76	4	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	1	100	0	.	9	84	2	100	110	37	41	51	0	.	0	.	444	21
	lower and upper montane	146	51	71	42	171	38	931	12	167	36	201	24	0	.	291	29	52	45	455	20	301	24	256	29	129	50	140	40	1092	15	17	78	281	22	238	26	213	44	66	46	107	44	521	17	77	30	88	46	364	23	6376	5
	submontane	454	18	0	.	0	.	371	26	274	27	101	43	0	.	0	.	14	81	69	40	56	48	2	288	25	72	6	84	99	34	44	50	226	31	14	100	138	47	0	.	12	100	248	33	13	53	19	71	432	26	2615	9
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	7	91	0	.	12	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	65	41	0	.	0	.	6	197	0	.	0	.	90	36
	total	600	18	71	42	171	38	1479	11	441	21	304	21	7	91	291	29	168	26	524	18	357	21	258	28	168	40	150	37	1190	14	61	42	507	18	252	25	351	32	140	29	121	40	894	14	137	25	107	40	796	17	9546	4
ash	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	138	49	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	18	75	0	.	0	.	70	38	0	.	0	.	226	33
	lower and upper montane	217	32	41	64	220	37	572	24	51	48	334	28	0	.	218	52	31	63	496	24	186	29	49	49	193	51	55	52	681	19	34	100	172	39	221	45	133	34	41	47	56	66	308	27	103	42	51	72	565	24	5027	7
	submontane	807	20	0	.	0	.	555	20	326	36	354	33	0	.	0	.	56	69	392	47	417	60	32	97	10	100	21	71	379	29	70	47	211	39	99	70	614	27	0	.	14	88	985	20	49	53	205	52	712	20	6309	8
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	6	79	0	.	49	41	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	13	.	335	23	0	.	1	71	12	45	0	.	0	.	417	19
	total	1024	17	41	64	220	37	1127	15	377	31	688	22	6	79	218	52	274	30	888	24	603	42	82	49	203	48	76	43	1060	16	104	46	383	27	320	38	760	23	395	20	70	56	1294	17	233	25	256	44	1277	15	11979	5
oak	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	55	87	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	13	48	0	.	0	.	68	71
	lower and upper montane	55	49	0	.	12	100	37	54	0	.	38	46	0	.	0	.	102	73	7	82	114	52	24	64	1	100	9	100	14	71	4	84	107	54	9	88	46	58	50	74	0	.	124	39	25	68	17	100	128	40	924	16
	submontane	803	19	0	.	0	.	674	18	276	33	199	35	0	.	0	.	0	.	337	39	173	55	84	58	0	.	0	.	228	63	358	34	199	32	35	98	558	28	0	.	59	60	1483	20	27	54	0	.	379	27	5872	8
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	444	38	0	.	89	55	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	2	.	654	20	0	.	142	52	67	36	0	.	55	66	1452	16
	total	858	18	0	.	12	100	711	17	276	33	238	30	444	38	0	.	246	41	344	39	287	39	107	48	1	100	9	100	242	59	361	34	306	28	44	81	607	26	704	20	59	60	1749	18	131	25	17	100	562	21	8315	7
sweet chestnut	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	17	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	37	69	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	55	57
	lower and upper montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	245	40	0	.	0	.	11	100	0	.	0	.	256	38
	submontane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	39	82	69	90	0	.	0	.	107	65
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	322	33	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	4342	11	0	.	0	.	51	61	0	.	0	.	4715	10
	total	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	340	32	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	4624	10	0	.	39	82	131	54	0	.	0	.	5133	10
other broadleaves	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	10	62	0	.	0	.	10	62
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	11	55	0	.	0	.	0	.	1	100	12	49	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	2	100	3	58	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	3	100	0	.	0	.	34	41	0	.	0	.	67	25
	high-montane	0	.	3	.	0	.	68	40	0	.	4	52	0	.	0	.	587	19	0	.	4	61	0	.	2	75	1	100	2	73	0	.	0	.	13	66	0	.	313	31	23	51	52	49	322	21	0	.	0	.	1394	12
	lower and upper montane	91	72	22	65	40	55	602	21	63	42	78	27	0	.	138	35	168	24	204	26	146	34	68	39	50	57	59	37	401	22	7	61	154	39	151	35	6	80	880	16	84	43	249	23	176	32	0	910	134	34	3967	7
	submontane	757	27	0	.	0	.	490	27	273	31	129	41	0	.	0	.	0	10506	140	31	103	49	51	51	43	100	28	59	219	32	22	58	194	34	21	69	490	27	0	.	36	52	545	26	128	61	38	59	349	24	4056	9
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	23	64	0	.	309	29	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	1424	12	0	.	41	69	152	43	0	.	50	67	1999	10
	total	847	25	24	59	40	55	1171	16	335	26	211	27	23	64	139	35	1075	14	344	20	253	28	118	31	95	54	90	30	625	18	28	46	348	25	186	30	496	27	2621	9	143	29	887	18	822	16	38	61	533	19	11494	4
indeterminable	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	high-montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	lower and upper montane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	submontane	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
total	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	20	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	20	.
	upper subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	3342	12	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	14	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	254	34	28	.	0	.	1835	16	0	.	0	.	5473	9
	subalpine	0	.	0	.	0	.	3473	16	0	.	3	.	0	.	503	48	13512	8	0	.	39	97	0	.	164	58	586	32	521	36	0	.	0	.	182	62	0	.	2058	16	279	49	775	34	8161	10	0	.	0	.	30256	5
	high-montane	0	.	9	.	0	.	7792	13	0	.	1904	24	0	.	535	48	23234	6	0	.	948	29	0	.	232	52	1817	22	1045	28	0	.	0	.	1202	25	0	.	4572	12	2293	22	2825	18	12237	8	74	.	0	.	60719	4
	lower and upper montane	2576	19	2226	22	5197	17	43862	5	2545	21	11271	11	0	.	4169	17	4783	13	9972	10	13298	10	9566	10	1773	24	3983	18	18965	8	1013	30	5922	12	8735	12	1959	23	6891	9	1662	24	19642	7	2468	17	1957	25	7500	12	191934	2
	submontane	15122	8	0	.	0	.	18468	8	4709	14	5490	15	0	.	30	.	713	36	3686	16	5421	16	930	28	153	71	461	48	3670	19	3042	17	6241	14	486	47	7140	13	0	.	530	42	9345	10	501	31	427	48	12338	9	98904	3
	hyperinsubric and colline	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	560	36	0	.	966	24	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	46	.	7514	8	0	.	183	53	950	20	0	.	259	61	10479	6
	total	17698	7	2235	22	5197	17	73595	4	7254	11	18668	8	560	36	5236	15	46571	4	13658	8	19706	8	10495	9	2321	20	6860	13	24201	7	4055	15	12163	9	10605	10	9146	11	21290	4	4792	14	32771	5	26153	5	2459	22	20097	7	397785	1

Table citation

Abegg, M.; Ahles, P.; Allgaier Leuch, B.; Cioldi, F.; Didion, M.; Düggelin, C.; Fischer, C.; Herold, A.; Meile, R.; Rohner, B.; Rösler, E.; Speich, S.; Temperli, C.; Traub, B.,
2023: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 1297576. Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL

back