Selection from the list of topics

?help

your basket basket(0)

display result tabledisplay mapSelect a result from the list by clicking on one of the table or map symbols.

add to basketIf you would like to display more than one table or map at once, add it to the basket by clicking on the basket symbol. Repeat this until all tables you are interested in are selected. Afterwards open the basket and choose show all.

Filter Results

You can further limit your Results with filters. Hoovering over the info symbol i will display additional information.
Remove the filter by clicking on the filter again.

Filter Results

Inventory

(12)
i
2018/26
(12)
i
2009/17
(8)
i
2004/06

Topic

(32)
i
Ratio of the different damage events (e.g. wind, insects) which led to damage gaps. The ratio is determined on the basis of those damage gaps that account for at least 10% of the interpretation area (50 × 50 m) and on which, according to the information provided by the local forest services, only one damage event occurred. The target value thus allows comparisons of inventories from NFI3 onwards.
show more...

Classification

(8)
i
Altitudinal vegetation belts in the system used in the guidelines for monitoring the sustainability and performance of protection forests (NaiS; Frehner et al. 2005), reduced to six classes. The variable represents a simplification of the NaiS altitudinal vegetation belts with ten classes (NAISHSTKOMB) in which the classes «hyperinsubric» and «colline» are merged with «colline with beech» to form the class «hyperinsubric and colline» and the class «lower montane» with «upper montane» and «lower/upper montane» to form the class «lower and upper montane». The information is based on the altitudinal vegetation belts determined by experts (accessible forest sample plots of NFI4 on the 1.4-km network; Arge Frehner et al. 2020), as well as on the altitudinal vegetation belts modelled for the period 1981-2010 (other sample plots; Zischg et al. 2021).
(32)
i
Cause of the damage gap, e.g. storm, drought, insect or fungal infestation or timber harvesting. Reference: Forest Service Survey (MID 600: Art der Schadenflächen)
(8)
i
Areas in higher and lower altitude zones classified according to the system used for altitudinal vegetation belts in the guidelines for monitoring the sustainability and performance of protection forests (NaiS; Frehner et al. 2005). The boundary between the higher and lower altitudes runs between the «upper montane» and «lower montane» levels on the Northern Alps and between the «high montane» and «upper/lower montane» levels to the Southern Alps. The information is based on the altitudinal vegetation belts determined by experts (accessible forest sample plots of NFI4 on the 1.4-km network; Arge Frehner et al. 2020), as well as on the altitudinal vegetation belts modelled for the period 1981-2010 (other sample plots; Zischg et al. 2021).
(8)
i
Forest ownership, classified according to the two categories: 'public' and 'private'. Reference: Forest Service Survey (MID 365: Eigentum)

region

(32)
i
Demarcation of Switzerland used in NFI for protection forest analyses. The six protection forest regions were derived from the economic regions by combining individual regions according to natural and statistical criteria.
show more...

evaluation area

(12)
i
Forest of which less than two-thirds is covered with shrubs that can be accessed on foot.
(12)
i
Forest that was less than two-thirds covered with shrubs in the five inventories NFI1 (1983-1985), NFI2 (1993-1995), NFI3 (2004-2006), NFI4 (2009-2017) and NFI5 (2018-2026) and was accessible on foot.
(8)
i
Forest that was less than two-thirds covered with shrubs in both NFI4 (2009-2017) and NFI5 (2018-2026) and is accessible on foot.

grid

(24)
i
Sub-grids 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the field surveys on the sampling grid with a mesh size of 1.4 km (base grid).
(8)
i
NFI's sampling grid with a mesh size of 1.4 km. The 1.4-km grid is the grid size covering all the previous terrestrial Inventories, which is why it is also called the base grid.
search result: 32 entries on 2 pages
12
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI1-NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
altitudinal vegetation belts (NaiS; 6 classes)·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
altitudinal vegetation belts (NaiS; 6 classes)·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI1-NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
altitudinal vegetation belts (NaiS; 6 classes)·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
higher/lower altitude zone·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
higher/lower altitude zone·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI1-NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
higher/lower altitude zone·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
ownership (2 categories)·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
ownership (2 categories)·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI1-NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI5 2018/26
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
ownership (2 categories)·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI4 2009/17
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest
1.4-km grid
column total, %
LFI4 2009/17
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI1-NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI4 2009/17
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI4 2009/17
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
altitudinal vegetation belts (NaiS; 6 classes)·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest
1.4-km grid
column total, %
LFI4 2009/17
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
altitudinal vegetation belts (NaiS; 6 classes)·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI1-NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
LFI4 2009/17
protection forest region
ratio of the types of damage gaps
altitudinal vegetation belts (NaiS; 6 classes)·cause of damage gap
accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5
1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
column total, %
search result: 32 entries on 2 pages
12

Citation

Abegg, M.; Ahles, P.; Allgaier Leuch, B.; Cioldi, F.; Didion, M.; Düggelin, C.; Fischer, C.; Herold, A.; Meile, R.; Rohner, B.; Rösler, E.; Speich, S.; Temperli, C.; Traub, B.,
2023: Swiss national forest inventory NFI. Result tables and maps of the NFI surveys 1983–2022 (NFI1, NFI2, NFI3, NFI4, NFI5.1–5) on the internet. [Published online 30.05.2023] Available from the World Wide Web <http://www.lfi.ch/resultate/> . Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL
https://doi.org/10.21258/1769925